Saturday, October 22

Doubleplusungood

I thank all of you who have been so supportive recently. I have never before received so much positive feedback, and it was very heart-warming to know that so many people out there care. Having said that, it breaks my heart to say that this will be my last post on this blog. I wish I could just stop there, but I can not. The following also needs to be said:

For the record, I am officially a supporter of the administration and of her policies. I am a proponent for the war against terror and I believe in the mission in Iraq. I understand my role in that mission, and I accept it. I understand that I signed the contract which makes stop loss legal, and I retract any statements I made in the past that contradict this one. Furthermore, I have the utmost confidence in the leadership of my chain of command, including (but not limited to) the president George Bush and the honorable secretary of defense Rumsfeld. If I have ever written anything on this site or on others that lead the reader to believe otherwise, please consider this a full and complete retraction.

I apologize for any misunderstandings that might understandably arise from this. Should you continue to have questions, please feel free to contact me through e-mail. I promise to respond personally to each, but it may take some time; my internet access has become restricted.

Friday, October 14

Censor Seneless

Operation Truth has published my story as their Veteran of the Week profile. I am excited and nervous for the extra attention this will attract. Excited because the army is trying very hard to muffle the cries of battered soldiers, abused by the system they are sworn to protect. Each time our story is heard by someone new, the country comes that much closer to understanding what is happening to us in Iraq and Afghanistan.

I'm also nervous, though. Every time I add a new writing to my site, I ask myself if I've gone too far. I have a pretty good grasp on what constitutes a violation of the laws I am bound to; in specific, I am very familiar with the sections of the Uniform Code of Military Justice that strips every servicemember of his or her First Amendment rights. Unfortunately, the laws are purposely vague; designed to muzzle even those of us who tread with caution.

My stateside housemate, Ben, has unfortunately made himself into an icon of military censorship. He has written on subjects that violate neither operations security nor military law. He has, however, incurred the wrath of his commander nonetheless. Although Ben acquiesced and removed the offending material, he went on to write - much more eloquently than I could - about the experience. More can be read at his site, Doce Meses de Soledad ("twelve months of solitude").

If you are visiting this site because you were linked from the Operation Truth website, you can respond to my biography by commenting on the post below (entitled "A Brief History of Mine"). I also encourage you to sift through some of the archives. Most of my writing is just me whining about how much I hate the army; but I have linked to several which I find to be the most entertaining of my work.

Club Fed is the best of satire. In it, a persuasive argument is made for the benefit of being deployed to Iraq. Baath Time is a light-hearted entry about how glad I was to move into a toilet. In Black Hole, I explain my frustrations over the seemingly inexhaustible waste of tax dollars here in Iraq. Remember Petey is a story about a school (in a way); it might be about something else completely, but I would be forbidden to say so if it were. I'm not much of one to tell war stories, but Crude Reaction is the tale of one of my adventures on the streets of Baghdad.

For more fact and fiction from the banks of the Tigris, browse through the archives. Also, don't forget to check out Holly's site, and those that are linked to the right; the ones linked beneath the title "friends" are all especially good reading. Finally, at the bottom of this page, there is a disclaimer; please read it before you seek or threaten legal action against me.

Monday, October 10

A Brief History of Mine

The following was submitted, upon invitation, to Operation Truth for consideration of their "Veterans of the Week" page. I suggested the title, "Mesopotomac," which - in one word - summarizes what I am unable (or forbidden) to articulate in the following six paragraphs. It is also the title of an unrelated previous post. If approved, the biography may be published with photos that I am too lazy to post here.

* * * * * * * *

I joined the army soon after I finished college; the decision was an amalgamation of desire to serve, to belong, and to repay college debt. I wanted the challenge to see if I really could be all I could be. Our country was a vastly different place then; one in which policemen, firemen, and servicemembers were no different than any other American. I had almost completed my two years of training to become an Arabic linguist when September Eleventh dramatically changed the nation's climate. I knew my own role would be pivotal, and was eager to see our country avenged on the battlefield.

Until then, I had a rather dim view of the army. Their promise to repay my college loans turned out to be false, and I was left to shoulder the massive burden of debt alone. My dismay melted away in the patriotic euphoria that enveloped the country in the run-up to our invasion of Iraq. Like the rest of the America, I clung fervently to the justifications for it. The underlying righteousness was my source of motivation when we crossed the Kuwait-Iraq border in March of 2003.

In the months that were to follow, those justifications collapsed - and with them, my confidence in a nation. In those days, my colleagues and I would often patrol the streets of Baghdad with the infantry in a bid to quell boredom. We were also looking for hope among the Iraqi people; we could live vicariously through their optimism, and perhaps therein find meaning for our occupation. But hope betrayed us as the insurgency swelled. It was when the fighting began again in earnest that we left Iraq. By the end of August, I was back in The United States, free to pretend Iraq never happened.

But it had. And nothing could wrench the darkest memories from repression like the knowledge that we were to return. Worse, our year in America was wasted. Almost every week, CSPAN would feature one committee or another complaining that our armed forces hadn't enough servicemembers in critical jobs like intelligence and military police. I wanted them to know how poorly we were thought of in our own units, and how little job-specific training we received before we left. At one point, we were told to study Arabic only on our own time. That was hardly possible when we were kept late every night, sometimes doing only menial tasks like weapons-cleaning until three in the morning.

The last straw was "stop loss". My enlistment contract ended in March of this year. It is seven months hence, and I am still in Iraq. I propose that, in order for me to respect my commitment, the army ought to respect the contract we agreed upon. It was for five years, not six. Proponents of this form of conscription argue that I signed it nonetheless, fully aware of possible outcomes. True, I ought to have prepared myself better. But to remain bound to an expired commitment - exposed to prolonged peril in support of an unjustifiable cause - was beyond my expectations.

Today, I find the greatest challenge of the army is to find honor in service. I don't ever regret having joined because I've learned so much about myself and about America. I have faith in both, but yearn for hope to become reality. I want to go home as badly as I want to be proud of my country again.

Saturday, October 8

No!

The army has released new rules governing privately operated blogs, websites, and e-mails. They remind us that publication of classified material is forbidden, but they also prohibit certain unclassified information. For example, "posting any official Defense Department information and releasing information detailing job responsibilities" are now illegal. Furthermore, it is discouraged to reveal information that might "reflect adversely on the DOD or the Army".

In accordance with these new guidelines, today's discussion shan't encompass any of the above. Instead, I will explain why I support the "no" vote in the upcoming referendum on the Iraqi charter constitution. The vote - scheduled to take place no later than one week from today - will forge the foundation for Iraq's new democratic government. A "yes" on the fifteenth will mean the country will move ahead with general elections in December. Conversely, a "no" will dissolve the current parliament, and the whole process would restart from the beginning.

My official opinion is that the constitution needs to be defeated. The Sunni minority were underrepresented in January's elections: the result of a boycott based on an assumption the vote would be rigged and illegitimate. A disproportionate drafting committee was augmented by eleventh-hour Sunni "advisors", whose only political weapon was their ability to unite public opinion against the government when they were assassinated. It is, therefore, my belief that the process needs to be scrapped and begun anew, this time with the confidence of the Sunni voters.

Unofficially, I believe a "no" vote would negate the requirement to hold general elections in December, thus eliminating the need to detain my unit in Iraq months after our replacements arrive. This latter reason gives me a hope to cling to that I haven't had since our own country's elections last year. Kerry's pitch to end "stop loss" was my ticket to freedom. Now, so too is the defeat of Iraq's charter constitution. That I still find cause to justify it is my only salvation from the shame of selfishness.